CCO (Canadian Chemistry Olympiad), organized by the Chemical Institute of Canada (CIC), is an individual competition conducted in English, lasting 120 minutes, consisting of 5 short-answer and proof questions, with no laboratory operation component, and is by invitation only for CCC award winners. The CCO exam spans four major university chemistry courses—inorganic, organic, analytical, and physical chemistry—and includes one extended topic question; organic chemistry is a core module that consistently occupies one full question each year, and is the key battleground distinguishing Gold from Super Gold. Previous articles have covered CCO past paper patterns, experimental question strategies, and summer preparation planning; this article dives deep into organic chemistry: how to write reaction mechanisms, how to design synthesis routes, how to approach spectroscopy, and what the weight distribution is. As of July 2026, there are approximately 8 weeks until the 2026 CCO (September 19, 14:00–16:00)—this is the final window for CCC advancing students to take organic chemistry from "knowing how to do it" to "earning full process points."
I. Official Positioning and Weight of CCO Organic Chemistry
1. Scope of Organic Chemistry in the Official Syllabus
According to CIC's official definition of CCO, the organic chemistry module covers: nomenclature of organic compounds, functional group recognition, reaction types, multi-step synthesis, polymer chemistry, and biochemistry. These six major areas are explicitly listed in the CCO official syllabus and form the boundary of CCO organic questions.[reference:0]
2. Weight Proportion: Approximately One-Quarter to One-Third, with Year-to-Year Fluctuation
Based on a review of publicly available preparation materials, CCO organic chemistry accounts for approximately 25%–30% (about one-quarter to one-third), making it the second-largest module after physical chemistry. Following the 2025 syllabus adjustment, the organic section added cutting-edge content such as "biomolecular synthesis pathway design" and "enzyme catalysis mechanisms," with an overall theoretical depth increase of about 20%.[reference:1] It must be noted: CCO does not publish fixed module weight percentages; the specific placement of the 5 questions each year adjusts with the exam design, and the actual exam paper structure shall prevail; however, "organic chemistry consistently occupies 1 question" is a stable pattern in recent years.[reference:2]
| Knowledge Area | High-Frequency Topics | Estimated Score |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction Mechanisms | SN1/SN2/E1/E2 competition, electrophilic addition, carbonyl nucleophilic addition, electrophilic aromatic substitution, pericyclic reactions | 8–12 points |
| Synthesis Route Design | Multi-step synthesis pathways, retrosynthetic analysis, functional group protection, reagent selection | 8–12 points |
| Stereochemistry | Chiral center R/S, E/Z configuration, NMR splitting prediction, stereoselectivity | 5–8 points |
| Spectroscopy | ¹H NMR, IR, MS comprehensive analysis for unknown structure determination | 8–12 points |
| Biochemistry & Polymers (new) | Enzyme catalysis mechanisms, PLA synthesis and hydrolysis, basic reactions of carbohydrates/amino acids | 5–8 points |
Note: The above scores are estimated based on a sampling of preparation materials (on a full score of approximately 35 points) and are not official fixed values; actual question scores fluctuate with the year's exam design. Reaction mechanisms and synthesis route design are the "dual main lines" of the organic module, with spectroscopy often integrated with both.[reference:3]
II. Reaction Mechanisms: The "Visualized" Writing of Electron Flow
1. Core Paradigm of CCO Mechanism Questions
The essence of CCO organic mechanism questions is: "given a multi-step reaction block diagram, infer intermediate structures and write the electron transfer mechanisms for key steps." Judgment of reaction conditions is the core paradigm—nucleophilic/electrophilic interactions modulated by acid-base conditions are the main thread running through organic chemistry learning.[reference:4] The key to solving lies in comparing the skeletal differences before and after the reaction, determining where bonds are formed and broken, and then selecting the mechanism type based on the structural characteristics of the reaction center.[reference:5]
2. Five High-Frequency Mechanism Types and Standardized Writing Steps
- ① Nucleophilic Substitution/Elimination: Analyze the substrate structure (primary/secondary/tertiary), nucleophile/base strength, and solvent properties to determine the SN1/SN2/E1/E2 pathway. Standardized steps: determine reaction type → draw intermediate/transition state (carbocation for SN1/E1, transition state for SN2/E2) → label electron arrows → write products (pay attention to stereochemistry and regioselectivity). Classic example: tert-butyl bromide heated in ethanol → tertiary haloalkane + weak nucleophile + protic solvent → SN1 vs E1 competition → draw carbocation intermediate → ethanol attack (SN1) or deprotonation (E1) → mixture.[reference:6]
- ② Electrophilic Addition: Analyze the electron density of alkenes/alkynes, determine the attack site of the electrophile, following Markovnikov/anti-Markovnikov rules. In the presence of peroxides, the mechanism shifts to radical, anti-Markovnikov addition.[reference:7]
- ③ Carbonyl Nucleophilic Addition: Identify the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon, analyze nucleophile strength, and note acid-base catalysis conditions. Standardized: activate the carbonyl (protonation or deprotonation under acid/base catalysis) → nucleophilic attack → proton transfer → product. Acetone reacting with Grignard reagent CH₃MgBr is a classic example.[reference:8]
- ④ Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Directing effect (ortho/para vs meta) judgment + resonance-stabilized intermediate writing.[reference:9]
- ⑤ Pericyclic Reactions: Stereoselectivity of Diels-Alder (endo/exo), olefin metathesis.[reference:10]
3. Three Golden Rules for Earning Full Process Points on Mechanism Questions
- Standard electron arrows: Use curved arrows to clearly indicate the transfer of each electron pair; single electron transfers require half-headed arrows;[reference:11]
- Make intermediates explicit: Carbocations, carbanions, radicals, and transition states must all be drawn; no "skipping steps";[reference:12]
- Explain selectivity: Must state the reasons for regioselectivity (e.g., steric hindrance, intermediate stability) and stereoselectivity (e.g., SN2 inversion, E2 anti-coplanar).[reference:13] CCO scoring is process-point dominated; even if the final product inference is incorrect, a complete mechanism writing can still earn the majority of the points.[reference:14]
III. Synthesis Route Design: The Art of Retrosynthetic Analysis
1. Typical Format of CCO Synthesis Questions
CCO synthesis questions often appear in "block diagram synthesis" form: given starting materials and target products, requiring inference of a series of intermediates in a reaction sequence, or designing a 3–5 step synthesis pathway and writing the reagents and conditions for each step. In the 2024 CCO exam, the organic question "did not immediately test total synthesis; it was already a very gentle approach—inference questions are routine题型 for competition students"—this indicates that CCO organic questions test "methodology" rather than "reaction memorization."[reference:15]
2. The "Retrosynthetic-Forward Writing" Method
The通用 methodology of high-scoring CCO students: "retrosynthetic-forward writing." Start by tracing backward from the target product to possible precursors, then write the mechanism forward based on the given reaction conditions.[reference:16] The core思维 is bond-forming/bond-breaking analysis—compare the skeletal differences between the starting material and the target product, determining where bonds need to be formed and where bonds need to be broken. In the 2024 exam, the inference question had two key bond-forming points: N-C bond (result of imine attack on carbonyl carbon, requiring a weakly basic environment to deprotonate the acidic hydrogen adjacent to the imine), and C-S bond (thiol deprotonation, also requiring a weakly basic environment).[reference:17] A weakly basic environment is favorable for initiation, but the basicity cannot be too strong, otherwise the carboxyl group deprotonates and becomes a nucleophilic site, leading to side reactions—this kind of judgment on "subtle differences in reaction conditions" is the core paradigm of CCO organic questions.[reference:18]
3. Functional Group Protection and Precursor Selection
In multi-step synthesis, the stability of sensitive groups must be considered: hydroxyl (-OH) is commonly protected with silyl ethers (TBS, TPS) or acetyl groups; amino (-NH₂) is commonly protected with Boc or Cbz; carbonyl groups can be protected via acetals/ketals.[reference:19] Neglecting functional group protection is a major point of loss in multi-step synthesis questions. The 2025 syllabus新增 "stereoselectivity models" (Felkin-Ahn model, Zimmerman-Traxler model) assessment, requiring candidates not only to design syntheses but also to predict the stereochemical outcomes of newly formed chiral centers.[reference:20]
IV. Spectroscopy: Inferring Structure from Data
1. The Three Major Spectroscopic Methods in CCO
- ① ¹H NMR: Chemical shift (δ), integration ratio, spin-spin coupling (splitting patterns). The core challenge is "uniquely determining hydrogen environments through the combination of chemical shift, coupling constants, and integration ratios."[reference:21]
- ② IR: Identification of characteristic functional group absorption peaks (subtle differences between aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, and esters in IR and NMR).[reference:22]
- ③ MS: Molecular ion peak and fragment ion analysis.[reference:23]
2. Four-Step Method for Comprehensive NMR Analysis
- Step 1: Chemical shift determines functional groups. Memorize typical δ ranges for common functional groups (alkyl 0–2, carbonyl-adjacent 2–3, aromatic ring 6–8, aldehyde 9–10).[reference:24]
- Step 2: Integration ratio determines number of hydrogens. Infer the relative number of each type of hydrogen from the heights of the integration curves.[reference:25]
- Step 3: Splitting pattern determines neighboring environment. Use the "n+1 rule" to analyze splitting; a carbon with n hydrogens on the adjacent carbon will split into n+1 peaks.[reference:26]
- Step 4: Coupling constants determine stereochemical relationships. Cis coupling constants are approximately 6–10 Hz, trans approximately 12–18 Hz, which can be used to determine E/Z configuration of alkenes.[reference:27]
CCO exam NMR questions are not particularly difficult; understanding basic principles, signal counts, and splitting patterns is foundational, and chemical shifts are a matter of looking up tables—but after 2025, NMR is often integrated with synthesis questions, requiring "prediction of the ¹H NMR splitting pattern of products," increasing the difficulty.[reference:28]
3. Cross-Validation of Spectroscopic Data
CCO spectroscopy questions often require the integration of IR, MS, and especially NMR data to infer unknown structures, necessitating cross-validation across multiple spectra. Problem-solving template: MS determines molecular weight → IR determines functional group类别 → ¹H NMR determines hydrogen environments and counts → ¹³C NMR determines carbon skeleton → assemble the structure → use all spectral data to反向 verify consistency.[reference:29] Ignoring contradictions between any spectrum and the proposed structure is a point of loss.[reference:30]
V. Stereochemistry: The "Invisible Black Hole" of Point Loss in Organic Questions
1. Three High-Frequency Stereochemistry Tested Areas
- ① R/S determination of chiral centers: Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules + Cahn-Ingold-Prelog rotation rules;[reference:31]
- ② Prediction of stereochemical outcomes of reactions: SN2 inversion, E2 anti-coplanar, Diels-Alder endo/exo selectivity;[reference:32]
- ③ Association of NMR splitting with stereochemistry: Predicting the ¹H NMR splitting pattern of molecules, determining the chemical inequivalence of diastereotopic protons.[reference:33]
2. Two Core Reasons for Losing Points in Stereochemistry
- Neglecting stereoselectivity: Ignoring the influence of reaction conditions on stereochemical configuration is one of the primary points of loss in CCO organic questions;[reference:34]
- Errors in converting Fischer projections and Newman projections: For complex molecules, it is recommended to draw Newman projections or chair conformations to assist in analyzing spatial relationships.[reference:35] The 2025 syllabus新增 "stereoselectivity models" (Felkin-Ahn, Zimmerman-Traxler), requiring the ability to use these models to predict the stereochemical outcomes of nucleophilic attack on carbonyl groups—this is cutting-edge content that Chinese students较少接触 in university organic textbooks and requires dedicated reinforcement.[reference:36]
VI. 2025 Syllabus Additions: The Organic Integration of Biochemistry and Polymers
1. Enzyme Catalysis Reaction Mechanisms
Requires using organic reaction mechanisms to explain the specificity and efficiency of enzyme catalysis (e.g., hydrolases, transferases). The core is to abstract the enzyme catalytic site as an organic reaction center, explaining it through mechanisms such as acid-base catalysis, covalent catalysis, and proximity effects.[reference:37]
2. Degradable Polymer Synthesis
Using polylactic acid (PLA) as a representative degradable polymer, candidates are required to design synthesis pathways and explain the reaction mechanisms of each step. This is an intersection of organic chemistry and materials science, often appearing as "design an environmentally friendly polymer degradation pathway."[reference:38]
3. Basic Reactions of Carbohydrates and Amino Acids
Anomeric configurations of carbohydrates, isoelectric behavior of amino acids, and peptide bond formation require the ability to map classical organic reactions (such as nucleophilic substitution, nucleophilic addition) onto biomolecules. This content often appears in interdisciplinary integration questions, testing the ability to transfer knowledge.[reference:39]
VII. CCO Organic Special Topic: 8-Week Sprint Training Schedule
| Week | Training Focus | Key Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Reaction Mechanism Fundamentals | SN1/SN2/E1/E2 + electrophilic addition + carbonyl nucleophilic addition mechanism writing training, 5 questions per day with complete English writing |
| Week 2 | Retrosynthesis & Synthesis Design | Bond-forming/bond-breaking analysis + functional group protection strategies, timed training on 3–5 step synthesis questions |
| Week 3 | Stereochemistry Special | R/S determination + Newman/chair conformations + Felkin-Ahn/Zimmerman-Traxler models |
| Week 4 | Spectroscopy | ¹H NMR/IR/MS comprehensive analysis, 2 structure inference questions per day |
| Week 5 | Biochemistry & Polymers | Enzyme catalysis mechanisms + PLA synthesis and degradation + carbohydrate/amino acid reactions |
| Week 6 | CCO Past Paper Organic Questions | Timed mock exams using CCO organic questions from the last 5 years, check process points against Examiner's Report |
| Week 7 | Interdisciplinary Integration Questions | CO₂ capture + organic amine absorbents, lithium-ion battery electrolyte organic synthesis, and other integration questions |
| Week 8 | Review & Gap-Filling | Error log categorization + English phrase bank memorization + final full mock exam before September 19 |
Note: The above schedule is a reference framework; specific progress may be adjusted based on individual student conditions.[reference:40]
⚠ CCO Organic Chemistry Official Reminder:
- CCO organic chemistry official scope: the six major areas of "nomenclature, functional group recognition, reaction types, multi-step synthesis, polymer chemistry, and biochemistry";[reference:41]
- The 25%–30% proportion is a summary value from publicly available preparation materials; CCO does not publish fixed module weight percentages; the actual placement of the 5 questions each year shall prevail;[reference:42]
- Following the 2025 syllabus adjustment, the overall theoretical depth has increased by about 20%, with new content including biomolecular synthesis pathway design, enzyme catalysis mechanisms, and stereoselectivity models (Felkin-Ahn, Zimmerman-Traxler);[reference:43]
- 2026 CCO exam date: September 19, 14:00–16:00;[reference:44]
- Specific scores and question types are subject to the official CIC announcements for that year.[reference:45]
The essence of CCO organic chemistry is a comprehensive assessment transitioning from "reaction memorization" to a four-in-one integration of "mechanisms + synthesis + stereochemistry + spectroscopy." After the significant 2025 syllabus overhaul, organic questions no longer test isolated named reactions; instead, they require the application of organic principles in complex contexts—inferring intermediates in multi-step transformations, designing biodegradable polymer synthesis pathways, using NMR data to reverse-engineer unknown structures, and predicting the stereochemical outcomes of newly formed chiral centers.[reference:46] For Chinese students, the greatest leverage in CCO organic questions lies in the methodology of bond-forming/bond-breaking analysis: even without prior knowledge of a specific named reaction (such as Gabriel primary amine synthesis), as long as one masters the three-step approach of "compare skeletal differences → determine bond-forming/bond-breaking positions → select mechanism based on reaction conditions," combined with standardized electron arrow writing, one can earn the majority of the process points.[reference:47]
At this point in July 2026, CCC advancing students have approximately 8 weeks to focus on organic chemistry: the first 4 weeks should be dedicated to systematic training across the four major areas of "mechanisms → synthesis → stereochemistry → spectroscopy," with 5 English mechanism writings + 2 synthesis designs per day; the last 4 weeks should involve timed mock exams using CCO organic questions from the last 5 years, checking process point deductions against the Examiner's Report.[reference:48] The most critical cognitive shift is: CCO organic questions test not "how many reactions you know," but "whether you can use mechanistic and synthetic logic to solve problems you have never seen before."[reference:49] A student thoroughly trained in bond-forming/bond-breaking analysis, standardized electron arrow writing, and retrosynthetic thinking, when faced with a completely unfamiliar biosynthetic pathway design on the September 19 exam, will be able to instinctively展开 derivations based on methodological instincts—this is the true watershed for achieving a perfect score (or near-perfect score) in the CCO organic module.[reference:50]
# Canadian Chemistry Olympiad Elite Training Camp
| Hours | 70 hours |
| Class Size | 3–8 students |
| Delivery | Zoom live interactive online classes |
| Language | English & Bilingual (Chinese-English) |
| Learning Objective | CCO award in the Canada region |
| Target Students | Canadian grades 9–11 |
| Learning Support | Exclusive Hanlin Academy chemistry competition textbooks and materials provided |
| Pre-entry test: free subject level assessment after registration, scientifically evaluating competition foundation | |
| Full Q&A service: dedicated teacher group答疑 during the course (one答疑 session every 4 regular classes) | |
| Past paper practice for consolidation and improvement | |
| Pre-exam mock tests |
Course Syllabus
| Module | Session | Topic | Content | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foundational Chemistry | 1 | Matter, energy and quantities; Electromagnetic wave | 1. Law of conservation of mass 2. Atoms 3. Pure substance & mixture 4. Properties 5. Four fundamental interactions 6. Law of conservation of energy 7. Kinetic energy & heat 8. Potential energy 9. Coulomb's Law 10. Electrostatic force & potential 11. Electromagnetic wave & photon | 2H |
| 2 | Atomic structure, nuclear chemistry & mole | 1. Subatomic particles 2. Isotope 3. Element 4. Mole calculation 5. Nuclear decay | 2H | |
| 3 | Electronic structure, periodic table arrangement & magnetism | 1. Bohr model 2. Quantum mechanical model 3. Electron orbital 4. Electron configuration 5. Periodic table arrangement 6. Magnetism | 2H | |
| 4 | Periodicity | 1. Effective nuclear charge 2. Atomic radius 3. Ionic radius 4. Ionisation energy 5. Electron affinity 6. Electronegativity | 2H | |
| 5 | Chemical bond & properties | 1. Metallic bond 2. Ionic bond 3. Covalent bond | 2H | |
| 6 | Covalent bond advanced | 1. Valency 2. Coordinate bond 3. Formal charge 4. Calculating bond number 5. Exception of octet rule 6. Lewis structure of complex compound | 2H | |
| 7 | Molecular geometry, polarity & coordination | 1. Electron domain 2. VSEPR theory 3. Electron domain geometry 4. Molecular geometry 5. Molecular polarity | 2H | |
| 8 | Hybridisation, bond theory & coordination | 1. Hybridisation 2. Bond theory 3. Resonance 4. Conjugated system 5. Coordination compound | 2H | |
| 9 | Liquid, solution & intermolecular force | 1. Liquid state 2. London dispersion force 3. Dipole-dipole force 4. Hydrogen bond 5. Ion-dipole interaction 6. Solution 7. Concentration | 2H | |
| 10 | Gas & kinetic molecular theory | 1. Pressure 2. Ideal gas vs real gas 3. Ideal gas law 4. Kinetic molecular theory 5. Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution 6. Deviation from ideal gas | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Foundational Chemistry) | 20H | |||
| Physical Chemistry | 11 | Kinetics 1: rate law & collision theory | 1. Factors affecting reaction rate 2. Average rate 3. Differential rate 4. Collision theory 5. Simple stoichiometry 6. Rate law 7. Determining rate law | 2H |
| 12 | Kinetics 2: Reaction mechanism, integrated rate law & Arrhenius equation | 1. Reaction mechanism 2. Pre-equilibrium assumption 3. Steady state approximation 4. Integrated rate law 5. Half-life 6. Determining rate law advanced | 2H | |
| 13 | Equilibrium & stoichiometry | 1. Reversible reaction 2. Equilibrium 3. Equilibrium constant 4. Reaction quotient 5. Le Chatelier's Principle 6. Stoichiometry advanced | 2H | |
| 14 | Acid & base | 1. Arrhenius acid/base 2. Brønsted-Lowry acid/base 3. Lewis acid/base 4. pH & pOH 5. Conjugate acid/base 6. Acid/base strength 7. Ka & Kb | 2H | |
| 15 | Equilibrium advanced | 1. Polyprotic acid 2. Buffer 3. Strong acid/base titration 4. Weak acid/base titration 5. Ksp 6. Ionic reaction | 2H | |
| 16 | Enthalpy, entropy and Gibbs free energy | 1. Spontaneity 2. Enthalpy 3. Determining ΔH 4. Entropy & probability 5. Determining ΔS 6. Gibbs free energy 7. Determining ΔG & spontaneity | 2H | |
| 17 | Electrochemistry | 1. Redox reaction 2. Oxidation number 3. Electrode potential 4. Galvanic cell 5. Electrolytic cell 6. Electroplating | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Physical Chemistry) | 14H | |||
| Organic Chemistry | 18 | Organic 1: Hydrocarbon & representation | 1. Organic introduction 2. Hydrocarbon 3. Homologous series 4. Isomer introduction 5. Double bond equivalence (DBE) 6. Structure representation | 2H |
| 19 | Organic 2: Functional group & reaction | 1. Functional group with O, N, S 2. Addition 3. Elimination 4. Substitution 5. Rearrangement 6. Condensation & hydrolysis 7. Oxidation & reduction | 2H | |
| 20 | Organic 3: Isomerism & nomenclature | 1. Constitutional Isomer 2. Stereoisomer 3. Conformer 4. IUPAC nomenclature | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Organic Chemistry) | 6H | |||
PART B
| Module | Session | Topic | Content | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inorganic and Structural Chemistry | 1 | Coordination chemistry | 1. Coordinate bond 2. Coordination compound 3. Geometrical isomers of square planar and octahedral transition metal complexes | 2H |
| 2 | Molecular orbital theory | 1. MO theory introduction 2. MO diagrams for diatomics 3. Metal-ligand interactions | 2H | |
| 3 | Inorganic analysis | 1. Inorganic analysis 2. CCO inorganic questions | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Inorganic and Structural Chemistry) | 6H | |||
| Organic Chemistry (Advanced) | 4 | Stereochemistry | 1. Chirality & chiral centre 2. Enantiomer 3. Recognising isomer possibilities in molecules with multiple stereocentres 4. Diastereomer 5. Meso compound 6. Chirality of octahedral complex | 2H |
| 5 | Reaction mechanism 1: Introduction & free radical mechanism | 1. Organic reaction transformation 2. Common organic reaction & reagent 3. 4 types of mechanism 4. Free-radical mechanism | 2H | |
| 6 | Reaction mechanism 2: polar mechanism | 1. Nucleophile & Electrophile 2. HSAB theory 3. SN1, SN2 reaction 4. E1, E2 reaction 5. Electrophilic addition 6. Nucleophilic addition | 2H | |
| 7 | Reaction mechanism 3: aromatic substitution | 1. Aromaticity 2. EDG & EWG 3. Ortho/para vs meta directors 4. Synthesis involving benzene | 2H | |
| 8 | Advanced organic reaction | 1. Enol, enolate, enal, enone 2. Enol-keto tautomerisation 3. Acyloin, aldol 4. Aldol reaction, Knoevenagel condensation 5. Transition metal catalysis | 2H | |
| 9 | Advanced synthesis | 1. Extending carbon chain (Wittig reaction, Grignard reagent, epoxide ring opening) 2. Protection & Deprotection 3. Advanced redox (Wolff-Kishner Reduction, ozonolysis, epoxidation, hydroboration-oxidation) 4. Rearrangement (Claisen, 1,2-hydride shift) 5. Gabriel synthesis | 2H | |
| 10 | Analytics & spectroscopy | 1. Molecular ions 2. Mass-to-charge ratio 3. Isotope distribution 4. DBE analysis 5. IR spectrum | 2H | |
| 11 | Carbohydrate chemistry | 1. Represent chair conformations 2. Carbohydrate reactions | 2H | |
| 12 | Synthesis pathway | 1. Organic recap 2. Logic of synthesis pathway 3. Solving synthetic problem | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Organic Chemistry Advanced) | 18H | |||
| Physical Chemistry (Advanced) | 13 | Equilibria advanced | 1. Revision: Equilibrium 2. Ksp & Kf 3. Connection between ΔG, K & Ecell 4. Temperature dependence of equilibrium constant | 2H |
| 14 | Transition metal catalysis | 1. Single electron transfer (SET) 2. Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) 3. Cross-coupling reactions | 2H | |
| 15 | Photochemistry | 1. Photocatalysis 2. Fluorescence and phosphorescence 3. Quantum yields 4. Quenching, lifetimes 5. Jablonski and Förster diagrams | 2H | |
| Subtotal (Physical Chemistry Advanced) | 6H | |||
| Total | 70H | |||
Course structure and progress may be adjusted based on the actual situation of students, subject to the specific class arrangement.

